A high-profile legal saga concluded in Hong Kong on Tuesday as a 93-year-old renowned doctor, convicted of the fatal overdose of a top investment banker during a 2018 cosmetic procedure, was granted an unconditional release due to his severe cognitive decline. Dr. Li Hung-pong was accused of manslaughter after mixing four different medications, leading to the excessive sedation and eventual death of 52-year-old Zoe Cheung Shuk-ling during a Botox injection session.
The High Court ruling, delivered by Justice Kevin Kwok, followed a jury’s determination that Dr. Li—who is currently suffering from dementia and severe cognitive impairment—was unfit to plead. Despite this finding, the jury unanimously concluded that the doctor had committed the acts relevant to the charge of manslaughter, as required by law. The court made the decision to grant an unconditional discharge after receiving a societal welfare investigation report that did not recommend a guardianship order.
Fatal Negligence Detailed
The tragic incident occurred on November 12, 2018. According to court documents, Dr. Li, identified in proceedings as Franklin Li, failed in his duty of care to Ms. Cheung in several critical ways. The prosecution alleged that the doctor’s gross negligence directly caused the victim’s death.
Key failures cited by the prosecution included proceeding with the sedation treatment despite the victim having recently ingested sleep-inducing medication and her fasting status being uncertain. Furthermore, the doctor failed to monitor Ms. Cheung’s oxygen saturation levels during the procedure. When the victim began exhibiting respiratory distress, Dr. Li neglected to administer oxygen or provide an antagonist drug to reverse the effects of the sedatives. The charge also specified that Dr. Li obscured details about the medical treatment and drugs administered when questioned by other medical professionals.
The combination of the four separate drugs resulted in Ms. Cheung becoming heavily over-sedated, falling into a coma from which she never recovered.
Cognitive Decline Limits Sentencing Options
The unusual complexities of the case centered on the appropriate sentencing measures for an offender deemed unfit to stand trial due to cognitive decline. Under Section 76 of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance, the court can consider various disposals, including a hospital order, a supervision order, or a guardianship order.
However, the prosecution acknowledged that Dr. Li’s condition, characterized by severe dementia, limited the available options. They argued that because his impairment was not a mental illness like psychosis, a hospital order or a compulsory treatment order was unsuitable. Consequently, the prosecution focused on the possibility of a guardianship order, waiving the need for a victim impact statement from Ms. Cheung’s family to aid in sentencing.
Ultimately, the social welfare report presented to the High Court this morning advised against imposing a guardianship order. Considering this expert recommendation and Dr. Li’s advanced age and medical condition, Justice Kwok followed legal precedent concerning unfit defendants and ordered the unconditional release.
Implications for Medical Responsibility
This case underscores the critical importance of stringent monitoring and adherence to safety protocols during increasingly common cosmetic medical procedures involving sedation. While the court recognized the doctor’s severe health condition, the jury’s finding that he committed the acts of gross negligence involved in the manslaughter speaks volumes about medical accountability.
The ruling, though legally sound given the defendant’s current capacity, highlights the challenges the justice system faces in balancing criminal culpability with severe health impairments, especially in high-stakes professional negligence cases. The case number is HCCC137/2022.
Leave a Reply