The devastating inferno at Hong Fu Court in Tai Po has ignited an urgent public and governmental discussion in Hong Kong regarding the long-term future of the more than 4,000 residents displaced by the tragedy. While the government swiftly mobilized a substantial aid package and provided immediate lodging in hotels and transitional housing, the focal point has shifted to the complex process of permanent resettlement and recovery.
The blaze, which garnered wide attention across the city, prompted the immediate establishment of the Tai Po Hong Fu Court Aid Fund. Initial government allocations of HK$300 million, supplemented by private donations, have swelled the fund to HK$3.3 billion. Displaced residents were temporarily housed in various facilities, including youth hostels, hotels, and subsidized housing units, with authorities guaranteeing continuous accommodation support if needed.
Looming Decisions on Rebuilding a Community
The core of the protracted debate centers on three primary options for the future of the Housing Authority estate: original site repair, total demolition and reconstruction on the original site, or building a new estate on an alternative site within the same district.
Each option presents significant legal and financial hurdles. According to an economist, who spoke on condition of anonymity, reconstruction on the original site is complicated by the nature of Home Ownership Scheme (HOS) properties, where the government retains partial land ownership. Full reconstruction would necessitate the costly and complex process of unifying property rights, potentially requiring the government to spend a massive amount of public money to acquire all private shares.
Conversely, significant repair work—a common suggestion—carries doubts about long-term financial viability. Many residents are retired and would struggle to afford large-scale maintenance fees. Furthermore, extensive repair might not guarantee future marketability or habitability, especially given the government’s current fiscal constraints.
Total demolition and rebuilding could take seven years or more, raising concerns that residents, once settled elsewhere, may be reluctant to return to a site linked to trauma. Locating an alternative site in Tai Po, while mitigating the demolition process and accelerating construction, still faces high building costs, estimated at over HK$6,000 per square foot.
Experts have proposed various solutions to streamline the process. One suggestion involves distributing the social aid fund to owners based on unit size, providing them with capital to pursue new housing. Another approach is for the Housing Authority to acquire the damaged units at market rates, allowing owners autonomous financial decisions. Surveyors have also suggested introducing private developers, although the current weak property market makes this less appealing.
Beyond Bricks: Healing Collective Trauma
The recovery effort extends far beyond physical reconstruction. Counselors and psychologists are emphasizing the critical need for collective psychological healing and long-term mental health support for the community. Clinical psychologists warn that survivors, who experienced narrow escapes and witnessed devastation, are at high risk of developing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
“This is not just about the affected estate; it concerns all citizens in Hong Kong,” said Ng Kwai Lun, founder of the social enterprise “Embrace Simplicity.”
Mental health professionals advocate for a multi-stage approach, starting with basic safety and Psychological First Aid (PFA) in the immediate aftermath, focusing on normalizing reactions like insomnia and anxiety. Long-term care involves trauma-focused therapies and strengthening community support networks. There is a strong call for “one social worker per household” to ensure timely professional intervention and mitigate the risk of symptoms worsening.
In a poignant suggestion for communal healing, experts have proposed converting the original Hong Fu Court site into a memorial park and dedication facility. HK$A psychologist emphasized that such a memorial, much like the plaque erected after the 1918 Happy Valley Racecourse fire, would serve to honor the deceased and allow for collective mourning and reflection.
The idea echoes historical precedents, including the “War Memorial Fund” established after World War II, which continues to provide long-term, independent financial support to victims of major disasters. Establishing a similar independent fund, separate from government guarantees, could offer sustained relief.
The sheer volume of spontaneous volunteer support highlights the city’s empathy, yet professionals caution against “secondary trauma” and the potential for unqualified psychological assistance to cause harm. Psychologists stress that untrained volunteers should focus on practical support rather than attempting delicate psychological intervention, underscoring that utilizing professional resources is an act of strength, not weakness.
As Hong Kong grapples with these intersecting challenges, the decision regarding Hong Fu Court will set a crucial precedent for how the city responds to future large-scale community disasters, balancing enormous public expenditure with the delicate needs of a traumatized populace.
Leave a Reply